On Wednesday, April 25, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Arizona v. U.S., the Federal Government’s challenge to SB 1070. Here are my updated predictions.

In its recent Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority ruling, the Supreme Court continued its trend of shielding corporations and organizations from liability stemming from acts of torture.

President’s Obama’s remarks predicting how the Supreme Court will find the ACA’s constitutionality prompted a Texas federal appeals judge to question whether the Executive was challenging the Judiciary’s authority.

The Supreme Court ruled on Monday in Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington that it is constitutional to strip search minor offense arrestees.

Based on oral arguments before the Supreme Court earlier this week, I have revised my predictions on how SCOTUS will rule on the health care law. The results remain the same, though.

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the judiciary can hear a dispute over a law holding that state documents list Jerusalem as part of Israel, and the Executive’s refusal to enforce it.

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on two cases next week that will resolve the question of whether a sentence of life without parole is in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

Earlier this week, Virginia added a new legal requirement that women seeking abortions must undergo an ultrasound examination first. Is this constitutional?

Instead of defending affirmative action policies in court, civil rights groups in California are attacking California’s ban on such policies as unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court is going to consider Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, which will determine whether the Alien Tort Statute applies to corporations who have committed human rights violations.